Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

IJRPAI uses a double-blind peer review system where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous. This ensures impartial and objective evaluation of all submissions.

Process Flow:

Step 1: Submission & Initial Check
• Manuscript submitted through online system
• Editorial check for scope, formatting, and ethics
• Similarity check using plagiarism software
• Decision: Proceed to review or desk reject

Step 2: Reviewer Assignment
• 2–3 expert reviewers selected per manuscript
• Matching based on research expertise
• Conflict of interest checks performed

Step 3: Review Period (4–6 weeks)
• Reviewers evaluate manuscript anonymously
• Assessment based on originality, methodology, significance
• Detailed comments and recommendations provided

Step 4: Editorial Decision
Editor evaluates reviewer feedback and decides:
• Accept – Ready for publication
• Minor Revisions – Small changes needed
• Major Revisions – Significant changes, re-review required
• Reject – Not suitable for publication

Step 5: Author Revision (2–4 weeks)
• Authors receive reviewer comments
• Revisions made with point-by-point response
• Revised manuscript resubmitted

Step 6: Final Decision & Publication
• Final editorial check
• Acceptance notification
• Copyediting and proofreading
• Online publication with DOI

Key Features:

• Transparency: Clear communication at all stages
• Fairness: Objective evaluation by experts
• Confidentiality: All parties' identities protected
• Timeliness: Regular updates on manuscript status
• Constructive Feedback: Helpful comments for improvement

Reviewer Criteria:
• Expertise in manuscript subject area
• No conflicts of interest
• Ability to provide detailed, constructive feedback
• Commitment to review timeline

Author Appeals:
Authors may appeal decisions with valid justification. Contact Editor-in-Chief with formal appeal letter.

The peer review process typically takes 8–12 weeks from submission to initial decision. We strive to complete reviews efficiently while maintaining rigorous quality standards.